Fuck me!!

Having sex. Making love. Fucking. Doing the dirty. However you may call it, however many times you've done it or not done it. However many styles or positions you may or may not know. Whatever your outlook on it is, your theological perspective, your social view, whatever the fuck la. To do it still takes TWO fucking people. Whether it is illicit or licit or illegal or illegal. You still need TWO fucking people to have sex. Period.

Any fucker, even those with only half a fucking brain, would be able to tell you this. If 1 person is doing it, it is called masturbation, not having sex. Whether male or female, masturbation is NOT the same as having sex. You CANNOT have sex when there is ONLY 1 person involved. Whether it is legal sex or illegal sex or licit sex or illicit sex, you cannot do it without another person to do it with.

So tell me please, since the above facts have been established, how the fuck can you punish a woman alone, for having illicit sex? Who the fuck was she doing the dirty with? Herself? Then charge her for masturbation la, not illicit sex. If you insist on punishing her for having illicit sex, then charge the other person involved as well. It's pretty obvious that when she was caught with her knickers down, there'd have been at least 1 other person (a guy most likely) in the room with his boxers or briefs down as well.

So what is his contribution to this crime of illicit sex? Why isn't he being punished as well, since he is a part of the act of having sex, illicit or illegal or whatever the fuck.

And to quote our "honourable home minister", it is done as part of "executing our responsibility". Really? Then why the delay in "executing your responsibility" with Kartika? It is so fucking clear what has happened here that it is fucking pathetic to listen to people, ministers no less, trying to fucking justify it.

In case my two (oh sorry, it's three now) readers still can't grasp what the minister is asking you to read between the lines as he's holding three fingers up to you, he wants you to know that he has played his trump card to get his sorry government out of the Kartika predicament. If you recall, the problem was caused by the over eager government controlled judiciary to prove their over-religiousness.

This backfired when they got caught -not literally with their pants down though- by moderate folks who questioned the rationales for the caning, the expertise required for it and the potential loss of image to this progressive moderate modern nation. So they begged her to appeal, thinking that they could have squeezed their sorry asses out of the predicament, granted her the appeal, and not caned her. The spanner in this plan was when Kartika refused to appeal.

So "honorable" minister, just for your information, we can see through this backdoor ploy of yours. Quietly cane three chics for having sex, and proclaim loudly and proudly that Kartika is a non-issue as we have been already implementing caning. You're so predictable!! And pathetic!!

And speaking of backdoors, which i think is the only thing your rotten government is good for, your "Backdoor Drama" involving Saiful's unlocked backdoor has gotten from bad to worse, hasn't it?

What kind of court proceeds with a sodomy trial when there's been no sodomy (since sodomy is loosely defined as anal penetration & the doctor's report clearly says there's been no penetration) ?

But, let's save that for another day shall we? Let's get back to the issue at hand, which is the caning of the three women for allegedly having illicit sex.

Please get the three men who they had illicit sex with and duly charge them too if you're fucking serious about this "protecting the sanctity of the religion" bullshit. Otherwise just shut the fuck up and leave whoever wants to fuck whomever, wherever, whenever, alone. Cos it definitely is the responsibility of both males AND females to protect the sanctity of any religion.

Get it?